This may just be the beginning of many more battles between Nigeria’s immediate past Minister of Petroleum Resources, Mrs. Deziani Alison Madueke, and the Indian High Commissioner to Nigeria, Mr. Ajjampur R. Ghanashyam, over the latter’s allegation linking the former minister to a $15 billion oil deal.
Alison-Madueke, who is reportedly on admission in a foreign hospital abroad and is currently being investigated by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), has gathered her team of lawyers and demanded a public apology from Ghanashyam.
She also warned the Indian High Commissioner to stop demeaning his exulted position.
Read the raw statement we received from her media office below:
Mrs. Diezani K. Alison-Madueke, immediate past Minister for Petroleum Resources has dismissed allegations made by the Indian High Commissioner to Nigeria to the effect that as former minister she “sat” on a $15 billion oil deal, describing it as spurious, unfounded and libelous.
Alison-Madueke who spoke through her lawyers, Messers Chike Amobi and Co. said the High commissioner Mr. Ajjampur R. Ghanashyam’s acrimony towards her is due to the refusal of the Federal Government of Nigeria to allow the Indian company, Oil and Gas Commission Videsh Limited (OVL), default on its contractual obligation to provide a $ 6 billion investment, (around RS 36, 600 crore) in an 180,000 barrels (bpd) Greenfield refinery and 2,000 megawatt power plant or railway line from East to West of Nigeria.
In a release made to journalists in Abuja the former minister said the publication by Mr. Ajjampur R. Ghanashyam to the effect that she delayed the approval of oil concession to twin Indian companies, Oil and Gas Commission Videsh Limited (OVL) and Mittal Energy International JV, OMEL (MITTAL) in 2006, after receiving a $25,000,000.00 signature bonus, is spurious , false and lacking in substance.
Madueke clarified that she was not the Minister of Petroleum Resources in 2006 when the said Indian companies entered into contractual agreement with the Federal Government and as such wouldn’t have received any signature bonus either as citizen or minister of the Federal Republic. She also said she had no personal reason to sit on the contract and wonder why the High Commissioner will choose to malign and attack her rather than commend her acting dispassionately in recommending for refund of the said signature bonus to the Indians when the matter was brought to her attention at the twilight of her tenure as Minister.
Her words, ‘when the issue of the request for refund, made by OVL which was re-presented to me in May 2015, I immediately prepared and dispatched a letter dated 13th May, 2015, Ref #: PI.LM/3900/S.693/Vol.1/78b to former President, Goodluck Ebele Jonathan (GCFR) recommending for the refund of the said signature bonus in compliance with the relevant and extant laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria which requires such approvals to be granted by the President, and implemented by the Federal Ministry of Finance.
Mrs. Madueke further explained that the Federal Government voided the contract with OVL because the company wanted the Federal Government of Nigeria to waive the commitments they made during the bidding process which included investing $6 billion (around RS 36,600 crore) in an 180,000 barrels per day (bpd) greenfield refinery, a 2000 megawatt power plant or a railway line from East to West of Nigeria, all of which were considered in granting the concession in the first place.
On the allegation that the Indian High Commission to Nigeria, Abuja suggested that contrary to global best practices in the industry, Mrs. Diezani K. Alison-Madueke, (CON), used intermediaries to receive payment for crude oil transactions with India, clearly imputing a fraudulent ill-feeling to the former Minister’s operation , the former Minister explained that the Contract in question was a Government to Government crude oil sales transaction with established procedures which predates her tenure as Minister.
She averred that the established procedure stipulates that the buying country, in this case India, selects and presents a local company as its agent to transact on its behalf as it is never the responsibility of selling country to select or nominate a company for the buying country.
She maintained that Nigeria never dictated nor suggested any intermediary or marketing company for India for the purposes of the said transaction. Apparently, the Indian High Commission to Nigerian, Abuja mischievously obfuscated these facts to malign the former Nigerian Petroleum Minister whilst not disclosing that it was a Government to Government crude sales transaction.
The former Minister disclosed that what Mr. Ajjampur R. Ghanashyam neglected to inform Daily Trust and Nigerians is that the oil concession was not granted to Oil and Gas Commission Videsh Limited (OVL) and Mittal Energy International JV, OMEL (MITTAL), due to inability of their subsidiary EMO Exploration and Production to meet cash obligation.
According to the lawyers acting on behalf of the minister “Mr. Ajjampur R. Ghanashyam’s acrimony towards our client is due to the refusal of the Federal Government of Nigeria to allow OVL default on its contractual obligation to Nigeria in the case of:
•A $ 6 billion investment, (around RS 36, 600 crore) in an 180,000 barrels (bpd) Greenfield refinery.
•2,000 megawatt power plant or railway line from East to West of Nigeria.”, the statement added.
Mrs. Alison-Madueke blasted the High commissioner saying that as a diplomat, who should foster bilateral and multilateral relations between his country and Nigeria, Mr. Ajjampur R. Ghanashyam, who is the leader of the Indian diplomatic mission to Nigeria, belittled “such a lofty position by officiously spreading false and misleading information calculated to malign Nigerian public officials , a conduct unbecoming of a foreign diplomat”.
“We believe the conduct of Mr. Ajjampur R. Ghanashyam is aimed at damaging our client’s reputation for her insistence on protecting the interests of the people of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and for not acceding to inappropriate requests of his country to be relieved of its contractual obligations to Nigeria.
“Based on the falsity and unfounded allegations against our client, we firmly but humbly request an unequivocal apology and a complete retraction of the libelous statements from Mr. Ajjampur R. Ghanashyam against our client.
Mrs. Madueke advised Mr. Ajjampur R. Ghanashyam to govern his future conduct accordingly to prevent the possibility of reoccurrence of any other events that could potentially diminish the exalted office of a diplomat he represents.